
This article is principally of interest to those  who play an instrument with a mouthpiece. They use two membranes which are an  integral part of our body--lips. However, other wind instrumentalists,  using their mouth to play, may also read this page and understand that any  tense and voluntary action of that part of the body will lead to the same  results I am about to explain. 
  The work of the lips takes too predominant a  role in the way some musicians play. They limit themselves to finding different  ways to position their lips, trying to modulate the pinch as the range of  sound change. This concern often overshadows the main process of sound  production based on the technique of "relaxed breathing" and which  has been discussed in previous pages. Those different positions  cause the facial muscles to contract, which is detrimental to relaxed playing.  The mouthpiece more or less squashes the lips. This is sometimes called  "playing on the mouth". It leads very rapidly to physical tiredness  and being less in tune, (the tone rises) and a difference in the quality of  sound. It is always 
  possible to correct the problem, but how  complicated that is and how it jeopardize your confidence!
  Mr Robert Pichaureau went  through all of this in his beginnings as a trumpet player. He was intelligent  enough to ask himself why and to analyze the situation so he could share it  with us. We will never be able to thank him enough. As in the previous  pages, I try to put in writing for you, what he taught in his lessons and  that I still feel today. I also refer to the  Journal of Médecine des Arts N°8 (June 1994), quoted in my introduction. The physiological medical test carried out by a college of  professors from Pitié Salpetrière Faculty in Paris revealed  "no-pressure" of  the mouthpiece on my lips. Indeed, in the same exercise of arpeggios, low -  high - 
  low, the pressure exerted on the lips was 0.5 kg  for me on the top notes and 3 kg for the other player. The  "trauma" (medical term), on the two lips and the teeth, was not  obviously identical. The consequences are much more weighty in the second  case. Let us consider then which is the most favorable procedure to play for  longer and without unneeded pain. 
  
  We may note that the noise of the sound coming  from the instrument is the result of the amplification of vibrations caused by  the two membranes--"lips". It is comparable to the noise made by a  mosquito flying. But this vibration should not be obtained by muscular  pressure of one lip on the other with intent to force them closed, but be a  passing 
  of warm breath (as in singing) between the two  firm membranes. To illustrate this, take a conversation for example: "Good  day, perhaps you are going to Paris?" If you lean heavily on the  consonants, insisting on the start of each word or phrase, you will probably  obtain a broken up conversation, not very melodious to the ear: "Good Day,  Perhaps you are Going To Paris?" It is concentrating of the start of the  pronunciation that creates the problem. It is the player's  "pou" on the mouthpiece which has replaced the famous "tu"  of former generations, obtained by quickly pulling back the tongue from between  the teeth as if to remove a fleck of tobacco stuck on them. This practice is  luckily infrequent now, but nevertheless the "pou" is still 
risky since it involves closing the lips first  and opening them only by force under pressure. This technique contradicts  everything I have explained in preceding pages.
Of course the position of  the upper and lower lip must be taken into consideration, but only at the same  level as when one whistles. Whistling while you work for example. Some people  cannot whistle, either because they force the round shape of the lips or  because it's too relaxed. One must find a compromise between the two. Very  often, whilst looking for the sound, people tend to hold their breath by  contraction. When there are problems pinching the mouthpiece, the lips should  never be exercised independently of the body's other breathing movements.
We  shall then analyze this external part of the body, which is the first to be in  physical contact with the instrument. The first part of the instrument in  contact with the body is of course called the mouthpiece.
On one hand we have  living flesh, in two parts, composed of muscles irrigated by small blood  vessels, all this resting on the teeth. On the other hand is just one element,  a metallic mass, more often than not, an inert and hard circle. This initial  comparison, based only on the simple description of the matter of these two  elements, would lead us to believe that when they first meet 
  there would be "difficult and painful  defeat of flesh on metal". Some trumpet players suffered during their  careers (sprained lips, surgical operations etc.). Hence it becomes really  important to find a lip position, placing them in a pinching hold which is the  most effective, long lasting and comfortable possible. I would remind you that  playing a musical instrument is an artistic fulfillment for human beings, where  the result and the artistic value are not measured on the scale of physical  suffering.
To achieve this, logically it is necessary to  pull as many muscles together as possible into a concentric circle to take the  metal circle of the mouthpiece. Louis Maggio illustrates this very well with a  frontal photo of a chimpanzee. The two lips come together, the corners of the  mouth tend to tighten up (fig. a). One may see the form of a volcano. What must  be avoided, is the widening of the corners of the mouth to form a pinching hold  that looks like a pair of pincers. (fig. b)

One can also copy the mouth position of a small  animal calling, to quickly get the lips into place.
  The action of the  mouthpiece is limited to a simple reception of the vibrations. I name it "wash  basin for vibration reception". Of course, the shape of the "wash  basin" affects the making of sound. The depth 
  and width of the cup, its rim, the throat  and the backbore, all affect the conduction of vibrations inside the  attached pipe  (trumpets, horns, trombone, tubas).
  However, not  to keep thinking of this "problem" of vibration {"please let  me get a vibration at the right time"), the best method is precisely  not to try and do it. That may appear contradictory and yet...! To understand  this more clearly, let us come back to the production of sound with our voice. When  we speak, our vocal cords operate without us specifically trying to make them  vibrate. The passage of hot air held back is sufficient. The more we hold it  back, the more melodious is the vibration (see previous pages). 
  Unfortunately, some jobs using the voice can  lead us adrift before we notice and damage our vocal cords 
  making us lose our voice: the school teacher for  instance. He, or she, voluntarily pulls on the throat muscles too much. He does  not hold back his breath enough. We say that he has externalized and saturated  the passage between the vocal cords. 
  Basing my argument on this comparison, I advise  singing first a very deep "U" thereby setting the vocal cords into  vibration just before the lips, by pulling them together as shown above. To begin  with, keep the two sounds. You will notice that your mind is much less focused  on the vibration of the lips. The desire to make them vibrate is less urgent.  If you cannot make both sounds at the same time, this means that you are using  too much air and not holding it back, (ref. work on the diaphragm). Secondly,  you must try to change the range of sound of the 
  trumpet without moving the pitch of the  singing. This is not easy at first, but you should try every day and gain  little by little in the instrument range. You should not try to put colour into  your singing, the vocal cords must work as slackly as possible. The best way is  to imitate a groan, close to a low note relative to each person, without  scraping the vocal cords. All through these exercises it is important to keep  the lips together as shown in the drawing above. The internal bodily sensations  should be engraved on our subconscious, so that they can be reproduced without  using the vocal cords.
  To understand lip vibration more clearly, it is  interesting to compare the passage of hot air to a rubber ball. It will bounce  back very quickly on a hard surface but will fall with no rebound on a soft  surface. Hence the necessity of 
  having firm lips so that the warm breath may  rebound and form a vibration. This is unfortunatley where the instinct to press  the lips on the mouthpiece comes from. Indeed, pressing hardens and  tenses the two membranes. It is absolutely out of the question if one wishes to  play for a long time or obtain the very top notes easily and perfectly.
  As you  may realise, the part "mechanical pinching" must be exercised  at the same time as working on the rest of the body.
  To summarize, the mouthpiece  should be set upon lips that are together, firm and not hermetically stuck,  then you use the singing breath to create the vibration. From then on, the  sensation of the mouthpiece on the lips should be mentally forgotten as much as  possible and one should listen only to the sensations inside the body. In  simple terms; interiorize.
  It is not very easy to explain this method  in writing, as the polysemy of words and difference in culture of each person  may lead to differences in comprehension and interpretation. I already pointed  this out in my first page. It was also the reason why Mr Robert  Pichaureau never wanted to fix in writing what he experienced and explained, in  order to avoid misleading and bad interpretations. He did not wish to enclose his  ideas into "wise pre-requisites". He preferred the  method to remain open, accesible to all those who wish to reflect simply and  humbly on themselves. That is why I also insist on the importance of meeting  people. I can explain my techniques orally with them (at a seminar or a day's  training course), and of course during lessons in music schools where numerous  parents of younger pupils are interested in this method, which moreover, they can  apply to daily activities.
  
 
  To continue logically and coherently, my next pages will be  about instrumental pedagogy resulting from this approach based on "natural  breathing", observing the body and the liberating of sensations to better the  music. Mr Pichaureau said:  "there is an artist sleeping in  everyone, without exception. Its roots are in ones deepest being. Each person  must strip themselves naked. It is through permanent research and having  confidence in oneself daily, that the artist is revealed. And not in coercive  measures, with their share of suffering, with a dominating  and "go-getter" state of mind. Questioning oneself assures the evolution of  mankind."
  This humanist thought is, I deeply believe, the basis for pedagogy with  profound respect for mankind. 
© Alain Faucher 2006